🔗 Share this article

Authorities are holding its debut parliamentary elections since the collapse of its longtime ruler, marking a cautious move toward electoral democracy that have faced criticism due to alleged partiality supporting the state's provisional government.

Legislative Body Election

As the war-torn nation progresses through its political transformation after Assad, area delegates are commencing the important step of selecting an interim assembly.

A third of parliamentary positions will be directly appointed by the provisional authority in a step seen as strengthening his influence. The rest of the seats will be selected using territorial voting assemblies, with seats allocated according to population.

Voting Procedure Information

Direct popular voting was not implemented since transitional leaders explained the widespread relocation of population plus record destruction amid fighting eras would cause such measure impossible currently.

"There are multiple pending legislation that require approval so we can advance with development and prosperity efforts. Restoring the country is a communal task, and all Syrians should participate to this endeavor."

The interim authorities terminated the former approval-only assembly following their takeover.

Legislative Body Structure

The newly established 210-seat body, called the People's Assembly, will handle enacting new electoral legislation and a constitution. Based on administrative groups, more than 1,500 candidates – merely 14% female representation – are contesting for spots in the parliament, that will function having a renewable 30-month term while preparing for later voting.

Eligibility Criteria

Following set rules, would-be legislators must not support the former regime and cannot encourage secession or partition.

Among those running stands a dual-national the candidate Hamra, the inaugural Jewish candidate since World War II era.

Area Voting Delays

Voting processes were delayed without timeline in Druze-majority Sweida plus in zones administered by Kurdish-commanded units because of persistent friction among regional officials and Damascus.

Differing Opinions

Critics contend the delegate selection system might benefit networked candidates, providing the interim administration disproportionate influence while sidelining certain ethnic and spiritual communities. But, for some analysts, the voting indicated a positive development.

Personal Experiences

After being contacted by voting authorities to participate in the delegate body, Dr. Daaboul, a Damascus-based doctor, explained her initial rejection, worried about the obligation and poor reputation of previous assemblies. Yet after discovering she would merely serve as part of the voting body, she accepted, calling it "a civic duty".

When polls opened, Daaboul expressed: "This represents my first voting experience ever. I'm happy, and I don't mind waiting in extended queues."

Committee member Eezouki, a national elections committee representative in Damascus, noted that the new assembly incorporates each spiritual community and population segments and called it "the historic first occasion in Syrian history when elections truly decide – absent fixed conclusions".

Former soldier Halabi, once employed in the previous government though he abandoned following massive anti-government protests encountered violent responses and initiated domestic fighting over a decade ago, commented: "This represents the inaugural occasion throughout our lifetime we've taken part in a democratic electoral procedure lacking foreign interference."